Difference between revisions of "CNC milling"
From NavykI
(→13012 Dykstra 62) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
**as a test Mr. Ranga ran with Ø80 bit around contour with 9mm step in it without errors | **as a test Mr. Ranga ran with Ø80 bit around contour with 9mm step in it without errors | ||
**lines/arcs should also be larger then machine displacement (depending on machine displacement the milling contours are divided in steps, can be adjusted in machine parameters) | **lines/arcs should also be larger then machine displacement (depending on machine displacement the milling contours are divided in steps, can be adjusted in machine parameters) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == 15057 Primaat 12m == | ||
| + | *Milled by [http://www.issos.nl/ Issos] | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 8 October 2015
13012 Dykstra 62
- File 13012 SY62 nest_Bulkheads rev_E.dwg (Bulkheads, relative simple)
- Milled by Marron
- Programmer > Mr. Ranga, with a background in CNC micro processing of metal
- Software > Maestro
- Router bit for outside contours > Ø8, 18.000 RPM, 6 meter/minute
- Arguments for small toolbit:
- less vacuum loss
- tool life is no issue for wood
- Arguments for small toolbit:
- remarks
- in theory lines/arcs should not be smaller then radius of router bit
- depending on software it will create problems or not
- as a test Mr. Ranga ran with Ø80 bit around contour with 9mm step in it without errors
- lines/arcs should also be larger then machine displacement (depending on machine displacement the milling contours are divided in steps, can be adjusted in machine parameters)
15057 Primaat 12m
- Milled by Issos
